786

Earthquake ResistantConstruction

PLEASE NOTE: Translation Tools for this page and all pages can be found on the right toolbar »

Page Contents: Intro | Presentation | Resources
click to jump to that section

Seismic Retrofitting

Retrofit Strategies

Many seismic retrofit (or rehabilitation) strategies have been developed in the past few decades following the introduction of new seismic provisions and the availability of advanced materials (e.g. fiber-reinforced polymers, FRP, fiber reinforced concrete and high strength steel). Retrofit strategies are different from retrofit techniques, where the former is the basic approach to achieve an overall retrofit performance objective, such as increasing strength, increasing deformability, reducing deformation demands while the latter is the technical methods to achieve that strategy, for example FRP jacketing.

  • Increasing the global capacity (strengthening). This is typically done by the addition of cross braces or new structural walls.
  • Reduction of the seismic demand by means of supplementary damping and/or use of base isolation systems.
  • Increasing the local capacity of structural elements. This strategy recognises the inherent capacity within the existing structures, and therefore adopt a more cost-effective approach to selectively upgrade local capacity (deformation/ductility , strength or stiffness) of individual structural components.
  • Selective weakening retrofit. This is a counter intuitive strategy to change the inelastic mechanism of the structure, whilst recognising the inherent capacity of the structure.

Retrofit Perfotmance Objectives

In the past, seismic retrofit was primarily applied to achieve public safety, with engineering solutions limited by economic and political considerations. However, with the development of Performance based earthquake engineering (PBEE), several levels of performance objectives are gradually recognised:

  • Public safety only. The goal is to protect human life, ensuring that the structure will not collapse upon its occupants or passersby, and that the structure can be safely exited. Under severe seismic conditions the structure may be a total economic write-off, requiring tear-down and replacement.
  • Structure survivability. The goal is that the structure, while remaining safe for exit, may require extensive repair (but not replacement) before it is generally useful or considered safe for occupation. This is typically the lowest level of retrofit applied to bridges.
  • Structure functionality. Primary structure undamaged and the structure is undiminished in utility for its primary application. A high level of retrofit, this ensures that any required repairs are only "cosmetic" - for example, minor cracks in plaster, drywall and stucco. This is the minimum acceptable level of retrofit for hospitals.
  • Structure unaffected. This level of retrofit is preferred for historic structures of high cultural significance.
return to top

 

Presentation

Download (20 pgs) » Powerpoint (5.6 MB) | PDF (0.8 MB)

For some more information on Corporate Social Responsibilty (CSR), try these links:

return to top

Resources


return to top

Site Tools

Updates Partner Login Researcher Login
LSI Group site
the entire web

by  



Related Topics



Featured Assignment


Related Topics